[303rd-Talk] WWII Planes

jprencher at aol.com jprencher at aol.com
Mon May 28 11:01:05 MDT 2007


Rex & Others

A few comments and my (opinions about WW2) fighters P51s, P47S AND p38S.

     All of them were very good birds. They all had strong points and weak points. With drop tanks all of them could fly to most all our targets and return to England. NONE of them could fly WITH US all the way to most of our targets and back to England WITH US. Keep in mind they cruzed a healthy 100 MPH or so faster than we did.  Once they got into a fight they dropped their drop tanks. Then they could fight about 15 minutes and then had to  head home for fuel
     Usually our first group of fighter escorts would join our string of bombers about the enemy coast in and go with us about half way to the target.  There they would leave us and another group who had taken off maybe a couple of hours later would join us and go to the target with us. There the 2nd group would leave us and a 3rd group who might have taken off 4 hours or so later would join us and escourt us back to near England 
     We were always very happy to see them no matter what kind of birds they were. My opinion from here on. The P51D and K was the best single engine propeller driven bird in the war. The radiator for engine cooling was probably its weak point. A BB gun could have shot one down IF they had had one up there and it made a little hole in the radiator. A P47 was a big strong heavy bird with a BIG aircooled engine. I suspect it used more fuel than a P51 and had better very high altiude performance due to its turbo charger.  As I best remember it had 2 more guns than a P51.
     Some of the P38 groups were switched over to P51s. I suspect most of these pilots would rather flew the P38 in combat. It had 2 engines and except for take off was still a pretty fair bird on one engine. The pilot sat between  them so they were good armour plate for the pilot. Being tri-cycle gear they were easy to land and take off. BUT. They used twice as much fuel and took twice as many engine mechanics to keep them flying SO they were a supply and manpower problem.
     This is long enough. So long for now. Best Wishes.
        Jack

s
-----Original Message-----
From: rex pearce <r.pearce763 at ntlworld.com>
To: 303rd Bomb Group Talk Forum <303rd-talk at 303rdBG.com>
Sent: Mon, 28 May 2007 1:25 am
Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] WWII Planes



Morning Spec, 
Thanks for kind remarks. I am always ready to put 
down the "Saving Private Ryan" syndrome. 
D-Day as everyone of our generation well knows, 
was a joint operation involving all the allies, to a greater or lesser degree. 
Rex. 
----- Original Message ----- From: <IBSPEC at aol.com> 
To: <303rd-talk at 303rdBG.com> 
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 1:18 AM 
Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] WWII Planes 
 
> thanks rex, you have been great news source from uk standpoint 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's free at > http://www.aol.com. 
> _______________________________________________ 
> 303rd-Talk mailing list 
> 303rd-Talk at 303rdBG.com 
> http://lists.303rdbg.com/mailman/listinfo/303rd-talk  
_______________________________________________ 
303rd-Talk mailing list 
303rd-Talk at 303rdBG.com 
http://lists.303rdbg.com/mailman/listinfo/303rd-talk 


________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.



More information about the 303rd-Talk mailing list